From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Small changes Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:46:47 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8xec13ig.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <15313.1172917217@localhost> <7vps7q7z44.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200703050752.l257qRog007776@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, julliard@winehq.org To: Xavier Maillard X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 05 09:47:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HO8qu-0002Ab-0Y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:47:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752089AbXCEIqu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:46:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752083AbXCEIqu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:46:50 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:63284 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752089AbXCEIqt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:46:49 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070305084647.LXTX26279.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:46:47 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Wwmn1W00U1kojtg0000000; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:46:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200703050752.l257qRog007776@localhost.localdomain> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:52:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Xavier Maillard writes: > From: Junio C Hamano > > Xavier Maillard writes: > > > * Makefile: add git-blame as a candidate to the > > byte-compilation. Change the function to call to byte-compile. > > Could we have a bit more detailed description on the latter > change? > > Sure. > ... > Hope Ihave been clear. Thanks. Received your other message and will apply.