From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Replacement for cvs2cl, for generating ChangeLog Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:27:25 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8xejflk2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <877iu3q13r.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Simon Josefsson , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 27 20:27:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HM7z2-00028z-QF for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:27:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752062AbXB0T11 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:27:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752055AbXB0T11 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:27:27 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:46416 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040AbXB0T10 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:27:26 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070227192726.NORZ6078.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:27:26 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id UjTR1W00l1kojtg0000000; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:27:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:37:23 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> * Is there a tool that produce ChangeLog files in the GNU format, >> based on the git logs? Similar to the 'cvs2cl' tool. The output >> should look like: >> ... > Let me hack something. I do not know why you want to pile something like this into builtin-log. It would add maintenance burden and I do not see a gain from it. One beauty of git is being scriptable. When somebody new asks for something like this, I think it is much more productive to demonstrate the power of scriptability than piling random crap in the core.