From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] adding support for md5 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:36:52 -0700 Message-ID: <7vac5ubn57.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060821204430.GA2700@tuatara.stupidest.org> <7vr6z9s376.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060823041453.GA25796@spearce.org> <7v3bbojbzj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060823064900.GA26340@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 24 09:37:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GG9mP-0000KZ-UZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:37:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750756AbWHXHgy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:36:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750762AbWHXHgy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:36:54 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:43425 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbWHXHgx (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:36:53 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060824073653.KTEM12581.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:36:53 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.5.203]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Djcs1V0064Noztg0000000 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:36:52 -0400 To: Shawn Pearce User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn Pearce writes: >> > What about all of those memcpy(a, b, 20)'s? :-) >> >> Surely. If you are inclined to, go wild. > > Like this? :-) Except some minor nits, yes. * I would have preferred two patches, one for "master" and one for the C merge-recursive topic (or at least "next"). * You missed a few in "master". * The cast in the second hunk in combine-diff.c was wrong; breakage was caught by our testsuite. I've pushed out a fixed up result in "master" and "next".