From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reverting "git push logic change"?
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:31:22 -0800
Message-ID: <7vacdnafx1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <20060120225336.GA29206@kroah.com>
	<7vlkxa30rd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
	<20060121001547.GA30712@kroah.com>
	<7vfynivx9s.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0601221311530.25300@iabervon.org>
	<7vr770c8db.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
	<7vu0bw9ch7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
	<BAYC1-PASMTP0532B701820FA4ADB3C640AE110@CEZ.ICE>
	<7vpsmjamgw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 23 02:31:33 2006
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0qYK-0007Zn-Ak
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:31:29 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751265AbWAWBbZ (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:31:25 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751365AbWAWBbZ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:31:25 -0500
Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:29426 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751265AbWAWBbY (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:31:24 -0500
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127])
          by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060123013014.KNVH20875.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:30:14 -0500
To: sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/15071>

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:

> sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> writes:
>
>> What about just always excluding the origin branch from being 
>> implicitly pushed; even if it does exist in both repositories?
>> In the rare cases where it is actually desired to be pushed,
>> it can be done explicitly.
>
> The problem is "origin" is just a Porcelain convention and we
> would not want to teach that to the core level, so that will not
> fly.

One improvement that can be done is to update "git clone --bare"
so that it does not create "origin", which is more or less
pointless for such a "distribution point" repository.

This reminds me that I need to deprecate --naked and introduce --bare
to the clone command...