From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] merge: use new "reset" function instead of running "git read-tree"
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:03:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vbpg3nsbd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100205231112.3689.34673.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Sat\, 06 Feb 2010 00\:11\:11 +0100")
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
> This simplifies "git merge" code and make it more efficient in some
> cases.
I vaguely recall somebody (perhaps it was you) tried to do something like
this before to drive unpack_trees() inside the main process, broke the
program rather badly, and then we ended up keeping read-tree invocation
external to the process. Am I misremembering things?
If not, could you describe how is this round different from the old one?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-06 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 23:11 [PATCH 0/9] add --ff option to cherry-pick Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/9] revert: libify cherry-pick and revert functionnality Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/9] reset: refactor updating heads into a static function Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] reset: refactor reseting in its own function Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] reset: make reset function non static and declare it in "reset.h" Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-06 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-28 22:22 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-06 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-06 15:29 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-06 15:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] cherry-pick: add tests for new --ff option Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] Documentation: describe new cherry-pick " Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 9/9] merge: use new "reset" function instead of running "git read-tree" Christian Couder
2010-02-06 0:03 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2010-02-06 15:34 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-05 23:45 ` [PATCH 0/9] add --ff option to cherry-pick Junio C Hamano
2010-02-06 15:27 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vbpg3nsbd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=bebarino@gmail.com \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.