All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-svn: allow disabling expensive broken symlink checks
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:03:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vbptlo7zg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090201021844.GB18855@dcvr.yhbt.net

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> writes:

> Since dbc6c74d0858d77e61e092a48d467e725211f8e9, git-svn has had
> an expensive check for broken symlinks that exist in some
> repositories.  This leads to a heavy performance hit on
> repositories with many empty blobs that are not supposed to be
> symlinks.
>
> The workaround is enabled by default; and may be disabled via:
>
>   git config svn.brokenSymlinkWorkaround false
>
> Reported by Markus Heidelberg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>

How common is this breakage in people's subversion repositories that
dbc6c74d (git-svn: handle empty files marked as symlinks in SVN,
2009-01-11) works around?

What's the way to recover from a broken import, when the subversion
repository does have such a breakage, and the user used git-svn that
predates dbc6c74?  Is it very involved, and it is much better to have the
safety by default than to force everybody else who interacts with
non-broken subversion repository suffer from this performance penalty?

Because the fix (that is broken from the performance angle) is relatively
recent, I am wondering if it makes more sense to turn it off by default,
and allow people with such a broken history to optionally turn it on.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-02  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-31 13:14 "git svn fetch" slow Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-31 16:23 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-01-31 17:01   ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-31 17:31     ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-02-01  2:18 ` [PATCH] git-svn: allow disabling expensive broken symlink checks Eric Wong
2009-02-02  3:03   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-02-03  4:45     ` Eric Wong
2009-02-03  6:52       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-03 19:10         ` Eric Wong
2009-02-05  7:42           ` Eric Wong
2009-02-05  8:02             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vbptlo7zg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus.heidelberg@web.de \
    --cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.