From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-svnimport failed and now git-repack hates me Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:05:41 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbqldfg56.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <204011cb0701031552j8292d23v950f828279702d3@mail.gmail.com> <7v1wmbnw9x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <204011cb0701040958k884b613i8a4639201ae6443b@mail.gmail.com> <7v1wmalez6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <204011cb0701050919w2001105asefe2fd99165dfa95@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 05 20:06:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2uNu-0004Yu-2v for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:05:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422682AbXAETFn (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:05:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422678AbXAETFm (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:05:42 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:35068 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422682AbXAETFm (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:05:42 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070105190541.ELME20715.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:05:41 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 7X4s1W01F1kojtg0000000; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:04:53 -0500 To: "Chris Lee" In-Reply-To: <204011cb0701050919w2001105asefe2fd99165dfa95@mail.gmail.com> (Chris Lee's message of "Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:19:35 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Chris Lee" writes: > Using git-verify-pack from master does not fail. It actually does > verify the pack (after a pretty decent wait.) I should have tried > master first before sending out the first mail. :) Depends on which "master" -- I pushed out the "chuncked hashing" fix on "master" as commit 8977c110 as part of the update last night. > Junio: Did you still want me to try those steps with that patch > anyway, even though it works on master? It would give us a confirmation that the above actually fixes the problem, if your 1.4.1 fails to verify that same new pack you just generated, on which you saw that the "master" (assuming you mean the one with the above patch) works correctly. If your "master" before 8977c110 already passes, then there is something else going on, which would be worrysome.