From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-submodule - possibly use remote branch to describe a module
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:39:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7viqyk6je7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208217154-992-1-git-send-email-mlevedahl@gmail.com> (Mark Levedahl's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:52:34 -0400")
Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com> writes:
> Absent user intervention, git-submodule will maintain submodules as
> headless checkouts of remote branches: such checkouts cannot be described
> with reference to any local branch. So, allow describing the submodule
> using remote branches before falling back on just using the commit id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
> ---
> git-submodule.sh | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
> index 28509ea..af195a7 100755
> --- a/git-submodule.sh
> +++ b/git-submodule.sh
> @@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ set_name_rev () {
> cd "$1" && {
> git describe "$2" 2>/dev/null ||
> git describe --tags "$2" 2>/dev/null ||
> - git describe --contains --tags --always "$2"
> + git describe --contains "$2" 2>/dev/null ||
> + git describe --all --always "$2"
> }
> ) )
> test -z "$revname" || revname=" ($revname)"
I think the new fallback sequence makes sense, but your explanation made
sense for me only after reading it two and half times.
- The original sequence ended with "--contains --always" which always
succeeded but with an abbrevated object name. You removed --always
from it so that you can add a better last-ditch effort that uses remote
references.
Side note. Removal of --tags from it is not justified in your log
message. It is sort of obvious if you think about it, though...
- The new one at the end uses --all because the HEAD is likely to be
describable with remote references, and without --all remote reference
namespace is not searched for a match.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-15 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-14 23:52 [PATCH] git-submodule - possibly use remote branch to describe a module Mark Levedahl
2008-04-15 0:39 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-04-15 1:55 ` Mark Levedahl
2008-04-15 2:19 ` Mark Levedahl
2008-04-15 2:48 ` [PATCH] git-submodule - possibly use branch name " Mark Levedahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7viqyk6je7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevedahl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.