From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Email address from username and hostname preferred over $EMAIL Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:17:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7vir8yib4d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <468D917F.9090707@nrlssc.navy.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , mkraai@beckman.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Brandon Casey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 06 03:17:43 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I6cS7-0002Wk-0U for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:17:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761271AbXGFBRk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:17:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761028AbXGFBRk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:17:40 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:65390 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760926AbXGFBRj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:17:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070706011740.PJME3098.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:17:40 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id L1He1X00a1kojtg0000000; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:17:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <468D917F.9090707@nrlssc.navy.mil> (Brandon Casey's message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:49:03 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Brandon Casey writes: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> If you want it to prefer $EMAIL, you'd need to change the >> initialization of git_default_email, methinks. >> >> Linus > > I just sent an email to the list, and not in reply to this thread > because I thought I read a comment about not posting a patch deep in > a thread. > > But, I'm thinking I should have just posted it as a reply to the thread > since I quoted a portion of your message. Are Brandon Casey and Matt Kraai the same person? I do not mind threadedness of the patch too much, but the patch recently posted by the latter does not have any description other than the title. Other than that, I think the change itself seems sane.