From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bits from git-pb Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:59:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7virys2n13.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20050729085819.GL24895@pasky.ji.cz> <20050730103103.GB26188@pasky.ji.cz> <7v8xzo42ru.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: junkio@cox.net, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 30 20:04:45 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyvgr-0007Qe-Sh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:04:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263091AbVG3SDf (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:03:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263069AbVG3SAq (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:00:46 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:20702 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263089AbVG3R7L (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:59:11 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050730175910.GKXN550.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:59:10 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <7v8xzo42ru.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:33:41 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > I have not answered this because I have not made up my mind. > Certainly (iii) is probably the least work for me. Certainly? Probably? Which one? I should not start typing before having a cup of coffee. **BLUSH** Anyway, yes I would appreciate if you take (iii) for the time being but if that is too much work for you then don't worry I'll learn to cope with any of the above.