Re: summaries in git add --patch[PATCH 2/2]

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> writes:

> From b039fb8aa03efab3faf46c0a0a8d84cea974f26f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:48:57 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add 'g' command to go to a hunk.
>
> When a minor change is made while the working directory
> is in a bit of a mess (and the user should have done a
> stash before making the minor edit, but didn't) it is
> somewhat difficult to wade through all of the hunks using
> git add --patch.  This allows one to jump to the hunk
> that needs to be staged without having to respond 'n' to
> each preceding hunk.

The issue is not limited to "forgot to stash" situation.

> Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
> ---

It is customary to explain what you changed since v1 here, after the
three-dash separator, to help reviewers.

>  git-add--interactive.perl |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-add--interactive.perl b/git-add--interactive.perl
> index b25a841..555c981 100755
> --- a/git-add--interactive.perl
> +++ b/git-add--interactive.perl
> @@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ y - stage this hunk
>  n - do not stage this hunk
>  a - stage this and all the remaining hunks in the file
>  d - do not stage this hunk nor any of the remaining hunks in the file
> +g - select a hunk to goto

"go to"?  There are a few more.

>  j - leave this hunk undecided, see next undecided hunk
>  J - leave this hunk undecided, see next hunk
>  k - leave this hunk undecided, see previous undecided hunk
> @@ -946,6 +947,9 @@ sub patch_update_file {
>  		if ($ix < $num - 1) {
>  			$other .= '/J';
>  		}
> +		if ($num > 1) {
> +			$other .= '/g';
> +		}
>  		for ($i = 0; $i < $num; $i++) {
>  			if (!defined $hunk[$i]{USE}) {
>  				$undecided = 1;
> @@ -979,6 +983,28 @@ sub patch_update_file {
>  				}
>  				next;
>  			}
> +			elsif ($other =~ 'g' && $line =~ /^g(.*)/) {

I think I fixed this with ($other =~ /g/ && ...) when I queued your
previous round to 'pu' tonight.

> +				my $response = $1;
> +				my $i = $ix > 10 ? $ix - 10 : 0;

This is different from v1.  I understand the motivation (i.e. if you are
at 73rd hunk of a 100-hunk series, showing hunks 63-83 instead of starting
from hunk 1-10 would be nicer), but that is something to explain as one of
the "changes since v1".

I think you are inside a loop that is controlled by another $i (see the
context in the hunk before this one) and it would be better to use
different variable, such as $hunk_no (or just $no).

> +				while ($response eq '') {
> +					my $extra = "";
> +					$i = display_hunks(\@hunk, $i);
> +					if ($i < $num) {
> +						$extra = " (<ret> to see more)";
> +					}
> +					print "goto which hunk$extra? ";

"go to"?

Again, this came too late for tonight's round.  I've parked your previous
one with fix-up in 'pu', but you are free to tell me to replace it
(together with [1/2] from your previous round) with an updated pair.