From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:11:54 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlkj2vset.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <45CFA30C.6030202@verizon.net> <200702130932.51601.litvinov2004@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Alexander Litvinov , Mark Levedahl , Git Mailing List To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 13 19:12:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HH28F-0002yE-Gj for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:11:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751419AbXBMSL4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:11:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751440AbXBMSL4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:11:56 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:64666 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751419AbXBMSLz (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:11:55 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070213181156.XVVS1306.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:11:56 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id P6Bu1W00F1kojtg0000000; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:11:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:04:26 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > No hooks means something like cvsnt does, and that means no .gitattributes > either. (BTW I really hate .gitattributes, as it does not at all say what > this is about; it's about file _conversions_, not attributes). > However, I am slightly positive about the .gitfiletypes approach, _iff_ we > think about more than just text/binary from the start. If we do it right, > it will buy us more. We might start with only binary/text attributes, but we may add more later, e.g. chmod=o-rwx. I do not see much differnece between attributes vs filetypes.