Re: [PATCH] Allow git-diff exit with codes similar to diff(1)

[Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>]

"Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:

> On 3/14/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>> > -     return run_diff_files_cmd(&rev, argc, argv);
>> > +     result = run_diff_files_cmd(&rev, argc, argv);
>> > +     return rev.diffopt.diff_exit_code ? rev.diffopt.exit_code: result;
>> >  }
>>
>> Yuck.  Let's call the former "exit_with_status" (meaning, the
>> caller instructed us to do that) and the latter "has_changes".
>
> I like "exit_with_status". But has_changes looks confusing
> good near return value of run_diff_files_cmd, which "has"
> nothing. Or do you mean to highlight this "difference"?

Maybe 'found_changes' would be a better name, then?

	if (exit_with_status)
        	return !!found_changes;
	else
        	return result;