From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Could this be done simpler? Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:29:58 -0700 Message-ID: <7vprcsymjd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7veit9m8cs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200906260002.40531.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <200906260023.03169.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 26 00:30:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MJxSL-0006LW-Nk for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:30:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753593AbZFYW35 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:29:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753574AbZFYW34 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:29:56 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:56554 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752788AbZFYW3z (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:29:55 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090625222958.EFGM25927.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:29:58 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id 8NVy1c0074aMwMQ04NVysx; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:29:58 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=YjxVEfEYJ9cA:10 a=dIu3SnmMAAAA:8 a=UuNRHE8GK7IFE6iMFhoA:9 a=oA-hiQXhRBJ7UUu7GJpmqOYQ8GwA:4 a=Rn8qiON8_f4A:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <200906260023.03169.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Fri\, 26 Jun 2009 00\:23\:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Couder writes: >> If someone creates a "git decompose-octopus " command then ... I am afraid that misses the entire point of my discussion. Such a decomposed octopus would _only_ be necessary during bisection, only when the user chooses to test two tips at once (instead of testing one by one), _and_ only its tree is needed for that purpose. In other words, we should be able to do this _without_ creating an extra commit, let alone replace mechanism.