From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Simon Holm Thøgersen" <odie@cs.aau.dk>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch: report local storage errors in status table
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:37:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vprq2moua.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080627035950.GA21382@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:59:50 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Previously, if there was an error while storing a local
> tracking ref, the low-level functions would report an error,
> but fetch's status output wouldn't indicate any problem.
> E.g., imagine you have an old "refs/remotes/origin/foo/bar" but
> upstream has deleted "foo/bar" in favor of a new branch
> "foo". You would get output like this:
>
> error: there are still refs under 'refs/remotes/origin/foo'
> From $url_of_repo
> * [new branch] foo -> origin/foo
>
> With this patch, the output takes into account the status of
> updating the local ref:
>
> error: there are still refs under 'refs/remotes/origin/foo'
> From $url_of_repo
> ! [new branch] foo -> origin/foo (unable to update local ref)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Makes sense --- thanks. This is something we can have automated tests,
isn't it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-26 19:42 bug related to branches using / in name Simon Holm Thøgersen
2008-06-27 3:02 ` Jeff King
2008-06-27 3:04 ` Jeff King
2008-06-27 8:32 ` Simon Holm Thøgersen
2008-06-27 3:57 ` Jeff King
2008-06-27 3:59 ` [PATCH] fetch: report local storage errors in status table Jeff King
2008-06-27 23:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-06-28 4:21 ` Jeff King
2008-06-27 4:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] fetch: give a hint to the user when local refs fail to update Jeff King
2008-06-27 23:31 ` bug related to branches using / in name Junio C Hamano
2008-06-28 4:18 ` Jeff King
2008-06-28 4:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-28 11:42 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vprq2moua.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=odie@cs.aau.dk \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.