From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Have git-revert, git-cherry-pick cleanup ./.msg upon successful completion. Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 18:42:49 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6ps5bvq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070504143022.8539.qmail@4071cc1c178e73.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20070504143210.8690.qmail@a4171e0dbe98e3.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20070505034615.GE16538@spearce.org> <7vps5efnv8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070508013532.GA11311@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gerrit Pape , git@vger.kernel.org, Alex Riesen To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 08 03:43:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HlEjH-00040s-Jl for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 03:43:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934597AbXEHBmv (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 21:42:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934600AbXEHBmv (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 21:42:51 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:55348 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934597AbXEHBmu (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 21:42:50 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070508014249.SDRA13903.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 7 May 2007 21:42:49 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id wRio1W00Z1kojtg0000000; Mon, 07 May 2007 21:42:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070508013532.GA11311@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Mon, 7 May 2007 21:35:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > Gerrit's patch to try and use COMMIT_MSG feels wrong to me, as > git-commit overwrites that file with what it gets from its "input". Yes. > I agree my patch steps us further from a "git whatnow", but we're > already in deep with MERGE_MSG. We might as well keep that existing > convention that it can be used to prep the commit message for the > next git-commit invocation, and record other data somehow for the > "git whatnow" case. Fair enough.