From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [git-svn PATCH] Fix markup in git-svn man page Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 15:06:45 -0700 Message-ID: <7vslacs0p6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070504070003.9117.75385.stgit@yoghurt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org To: Karl =?utf-8?Q?Hasselstr=C3=B6m?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 05 00:06:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hk5vP-0001PE-35 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031509AbXEDWGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 18:06:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031562AbXEDWGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 18:06:48 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:38688 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031509AbXEDWGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 18:06:47 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070504220646.JZWD1318.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 4 May 2007 18:06:46 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id vA6m1W0081kojtg0000000; Fri, 04 May 2007 18:06:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070504070003.9117.75385.stgit@yoghurt> (Karl =?utf-8?Q?Has?= =?utf-8?Q?selstr=C3=B6m's?= message of "Fri, 04 May 2007 09:03:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Looks sane to me. I did not know about double-semicolon, which is mentioned in the user guide documentation at the asciidoc site but I could not tell how it is different from double-colon form. I am guessing (from the behaviour after applying your patch) that it allows second level of listing...