From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Geert Bosch <bosch@adacore.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Dana How <danahow@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Packing large repositories
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:54:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vslbl8780.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703311033290.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:36:35 -0700 (PDT)")
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> In other words, the 256-entry fan-out was meant to avoid the first eight
> levels of binary lookup. But the thing is, we should be able to generally
> do a *lot* better than any binary lookup by just doing a LINEAR SEARCH,
> which is also more cache-friendly, and prefetches much better when it's
> not in the cache.
> ...
> - use newton-raphson to iterate closer. It should be a much faster way to
> find the rough area for the entry we're searching for than binary
> search. Two or three iterations should get us there, easily.
This is another egg of columbus moment that makes me feel it was
worth to have been in git community ;-).
I like it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-31 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-28 7:05 [RFC] Packing large repositories Dana How
2007-03-28 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-30 6:23 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-30 13:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-31 11:04 ` Geert Bosch
2007-03-31 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-31 19:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-31 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-03-31 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-31 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-02 6:22 ` Geert Bosch
2007-04-03 5:39 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-31 18:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-02 21:19 ` Dana How
2007-04-02 1:39 ` Sam Vilain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vslbl8780.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=bosch@adacore.com \
--cc=danahow@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.