From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] archive: provide builtin .tar.gz filter Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:02:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtybphcym.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20110616003800.GC20355@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v39jai94h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110616065146.GA30672@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110616075621.GA12413@arachsys.com> <20110616174653.GD6584@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Webb , Junio C Hamano , Ren?? Scharfe , "J.H." , git@vger.kernel.org, git-dev@github.com To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 16 20:02:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXGtV-0003eP-Bv for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:02:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758530Ab1FPSCM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:02:12 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:63430 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758508Ab1FPSCL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:02:11 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24EA5A5B; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:04:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=dbtrvQP85PPrDN0gGM5CM7uNgJc=; b=Z3oZ6m YSyPyj4LqoJiwa8qQ3RfR78S5tdR+W8Q59ESaFEMSw2/wOYOs+XsstMUca9h6JRv 6IF/sXgk2OuCRc8HBQKK9p6q7jUfvWgRq16qnznPQ/m2aJAHY/JjWpple8mQ5/lo ogF4pEpYg8mb04B/wQ9zDIX0aSvs6K5bIhf5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HgCgkRK+himDWFr65X9hkdy5vgDs27UI hFscO53AQumpWtNILkihxS5+WazCUhBAHMr+/XnjI3/jWX47Sgil3UE3hIz2ajjf kOnOLcc/lw8+WNLm0vCnKv0KIQ9jMQgtxT6LezxtTlBsdiyVsgPrkOcEspXI8tJs GdYVgXhpdww= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996EE5A5A; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:04:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1ED15A59; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:04:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20110616174653.GD6584@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:46:53 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0F6F9164-9843-11E0-A93E-5875C023C68D-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > OK. I'm totally willing to accept that people actually prefer the "-n" > behavior. I don't care either way myself. I just don't want the reason > to default to "-n" to be "because our test scripts need it" and not > "because this is what people actually want". Surely I share the exact feeling, and that is why I quoted the other "-n" added to gitweb because that was what people actually wanted.