From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git remote update -> rejected Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:00:48 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzhtygcf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1208857733.4695.37.camel@marge.simson.net> <20080422103458.GA14751@sigio.intra.peff.net> <1208861703.18689.2.camel@marge.simson.net> <20080422111113.GB11238@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Mike Galbraith , git To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 22 19:01:55 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JoLsG-0000Q2-Jx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:01:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755718AbYDVRA5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:00:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755625AbYDVRA5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:00:57 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:60739 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755430AbYDVRA4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:00:56 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7FE1010; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:00:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE73100D; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:00:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:58:07 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Dscho, is this a bug, or was there a conscious decision that I missed? > ... > But as I said, my rationale may very well be wrong. Whatever the rationale was, it is very wrong if the series was about rewriting the scripted version in another language. That is an independent behaviour change. And I do think the fix should be applied to --mirror case as well. If it does not "mirror" as it is told, what use would there be?