From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: perhaps time to remove git_blame from gitweb, and git-annotate? Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:13:15 -0700 Message-ID: <7vu02jfaec.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vejtnij5n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061005064817.21552.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Luben Tuikov , Petr Baudis , Jakub Narebski , Ryan Anderson , Johannes Schindelin , Martin Langhoff , Martyn Smith , Fredrik Kuivinen , Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 05 10:14:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVOM8-0004Kt-U1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:13:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751209AbWJEINU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:13:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751220AbWJEINU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:13:20 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:425 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbWJEINR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:13:17 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061005081316.EIGJ13992.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:13:16 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id WYDJ1V00N1kojtg0000000 Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:13:19 -0400 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061005064817.21552.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Luben Tuikov's message of "Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:48:17 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: It's been a while since we lost git_blame from %actions list. I am wondering maybe it's time to remove it, after 1.4.3 happens. While I was looking at it, I noticed that it would make git-cvsserver the last in-tree user of git-annotate. As I understand it, "git-blame -c" should produce compatible output to the command, so it might also be a good time to consider removal of git-annotate as well while updating git-cvsserver to use git-blame instead of it. Do people have reason to favor annotate over blame? To keep existing people's scripts working I think we should add a small amount of code to blame.c to default to compatibility mode when the command is called as git-annotate at least for a while, but other than that I do not see much issue against scheduling for annotate's removal. I am not going to do anything about this right now (the "master" branch is in freeze-and-stabilize phase), but if people have issues I overlooked, raise hands now please?