From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] (preview) Renaming push. Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 01:09:10 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvf2m2kex.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200508031908.22562.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <7vek9a8uy9.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vy87i46il.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 04 10:10:17 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0an3-0002ba-MI for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 10:09:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261969AbVHDIJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:09:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261973AbVHDIJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:09:13 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:44491 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261969AbVHDIJM (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:09:12 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050804080910.HXYX8651.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:09:10 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:42:06 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > Now, for extra bonus points, maybe you should make "git-rev-list" also > understand the "rev..rev" format (which you can't do with just the > get_sha1() interface, since it expands into more). Hmph. That makes sense. What I set out to do when I started ripping extended_sha1 out of rev-parse was actually something else. Remember I was stupidly wondering why "git log master..gitk" did not do what I wanted to? The reason I started looking at git-rev-parse was because I wanted to add "git log master...gitk" (three dots) which is equivalent to "git log $(git-merge-base master gitk)..gitk". That was what I wanted to have when I asked that stupid question. But unfortunately my GIT day this week is over, so the rest is for the weekend.