Re: notes, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2009, #02; Thu, 05)

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jonas Fonseca <jonas.fonseca@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:04, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> * js/notes (Wed Feb 18 11:17:27 2009 -0800) 14 commits
>>>
>>> Rebased and then kicked back to 'pu' to give the author a chance to
>>> rearrange if necessary.  I might do some trivial squashing myself.
>>
>> Will do.
>
> Although laziness should not be rewarded, this might be something that
> you could squash in as well.

Whose laziness are you accusing?  Me giving Dscho a chance to make trivial
clean-up of his own series instead of doing it myself???

In any case, I won't be squashing "oops - fixup" patch(es) in the original
series to the early parts of the sequence that introduced the "oops"
myself, as it would likely end up Dscho and I stepping on each other's
paws.  I won't be squashing this patch in myself, either.

> --- a/Documentation/git-notes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-notes.txt
> @@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ Documentation by Johannes Schindelin
>
>  GIT
>  ---
> -Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
> +Part of the linkgit:git[7] suite