From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:24:17 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwspmzhf2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080202122135.GA5783@code-monkey.de> <20080203030054.GA18654@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080203043310.GA5984@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 03 07:25:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JLYHk-00087F-Pu for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:25:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759699AbYBCGY3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:24:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759562AbYBCGY3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:24:29 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:59348 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758178AbYBCGY2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:24:28 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EDC6105; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4C56104; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:24:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080203043310.GA5984@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:33:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:00:54PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > >> That being said, the commit in your 'master' branch _is_ part of >> 1dd567d5, and should be culled. So I'm not clear on why it shows up only >> when you ask to see both branches, and that may be a bug. > > OK, there is definitely a bug here, but I'm having some trouble figuring > out the correct fix. It's in the revision walker, so I have cc'd those > who are more clueful than I. I am officially in semi-vacation-post-release mode, but I noticed this is reproducible even with a prehistoric git (v1.0.0).