Re: [PATCH] shortlog: take the first populated line of the description

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:

> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> ...
>> 	...  I cannot think of any good reason not to take the first
>> 	populated line for a shortlog.	The alternative less agressive
>> 	compromise might be to skip only completly empty lines at the
>> 	start, but I am not sure that adds any value.
>> 
>> 	I seem to get a lot of these in converted SVN commits.
>> 
>> 	Comments?
>
> Maybe it is the SVN conversion that needs fixing?

I thought about saying the same, but I am of two minds.

It is likely that you would want to clean-up when importing,
especially when you are planning to abandon the other system and
switch to git.  But you may want to have an import that is as
close to the original as possible, excess blank lines in the log
messages and all.

I think Andy's fix to make the output side take away
unnecessary blank lines is unconditionally good.

I've added these three lines at the end of the log message.

    This is often useful when dealing with commits imported from foreign SCMs
    that do not tidy up the log message of useless blank lines at the
    beginning.