Re: [RFC] git-fetch - repack in the background after fetching

[Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>]

Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz> writes:

> This is a follow up to a similar patch earlier
> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0605/21401.html -- is there 
> interest in making GIT more friendly to users who don't know or care
> about packing and repacking their repos?

I would be a bit worried about the niced background repack
racing against another instance of itself spawned by the same
parent.

> I loathe to do this conditionally only on the count of unpacked
> objects. If there's a quick'n'dirty way of asking portably whether
> the machine is busy or otherwise resource-constrained (ie: on battery)
> it should use it to avoid running repack at inconvenient times.

count-objects might be lighter weight than rev-list --unpacked.

If you mean to make core.autorepack to be boolean, checking for
string 'no' is not the right way.

	git repo-config --bool --get core.autorepack

But it does not matter if that variable is a string that is
almost always true unless the value is "no".