From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch --track: code cleanup and saner handling of local branches Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:01:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzm25tex6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vhcof2rur.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vzm2620wp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46919692.5020708@gnu.org> <7vhcoexqeh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v4pkduw2f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Paolo Bonzini , git@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Barkalow To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 10 00:01:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I81IR-0003ae-5Y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:01:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756797AbXGIWB2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:01:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756780AbXGIWB2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:01:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:64685 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756696AbXGIWB1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:01:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070709220126.MMXC1349.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:01:26 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Ma1R1X00M1kojtg0000000; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:01:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:05:14 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> It strikes me a bit odd if Daniel's remote.[ch] infrastructure >> does not give you easy access to this kind of information... > > Yes, probably. However, at the time he was sending that patch, I was > already preparing the patch. I was talking about existing remote.[ch] patches, which has been in tree since late May this year, not his recent round of "approach to builtin git-fetch" series.