From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262048AbTLZBen (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:34:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264439AbTLZBen (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:34:43 -0500 Received: from colo.khms.westfalen.de ([213.239.196.208]:61568 "EHLO colo.khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262048AbTLZBem (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:34:42 -0500 Date: 25 Dec 2003 14:11:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8-YBaPEXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <1072183068.1204.2.camel@ham> Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh12 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? References: <1072183068.1204.2.camel@ham> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mosca@mosca.yi.org (Marcelo Bezerra) wrote on 23.12.03 in <1072183068.1204.2.camel@ham>: > On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 09:12, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Le mar 23/12/2003 à 12:51, Bradley W. Allen a écrit : > > > DevFS was written by an articulate person who solved a lot of > > > problems. udev sounds more like a thug who's smug about winning, > > > not explaining himself, saying things like "oh, the other guy > > > disappeared, so who cares, you have to use my code, too bad it sucks". > > [...] > > > I've spent two hours on this problem, and that's absurd; > > > > Man, you've convinced me ! > > You've spent *two* hours on this problem ? Woah, these K-H and Viro > > guys must be dorks if they don't subscribe to your theories. Who are > > they to think their opinion matters more than yours, who spent *two* > > hours on this problem ? > > > > Are you the new DevFS's maintainer ? > In spite you trying to make him sound foolish, No need whatsoever, he managed that fine all by himself. It's rare to see such a concentrated amount of stupidity-by-being-too-lazy-to-do-trivial- research on a technical mailing list. Of course, whoever thinks Bradley made some profound point must be asked the same question - what made it impossible for you to do a trivial amount of research so you would not utter so incredibly embarassing stupidity? MfG Kai