From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid to synchronize rcu inside blk_cleanup_queue()
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:58:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8024ab9d-ae82-c8f2-83e3-a9d8fa4ba303@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180622114204.4ohrk53td3iijamc@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
On 6/22/18 5:42 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:55:22AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> SCSI probing may synchronously create and destroy a lot of request_queues
>> for non-existent devices. Any synchronize_rcu() in queue creation or
>> destroy path may introduce long latency during booting, see detailed
>> description in comment of blk_register_queue().
>>
>> This patch removes two synchronize_rcu() inside blk_cleanup_queue()
>> for this case:
>>
>> 1) commit c2856ae2f315d75(blk-mq: quiesce queue before freeing queue)
>> need synchronize_rcu() for implementing blk_mq_quiesce_queue(), but
>> when queue isn't initialized, it isn't necessary to do that since
>> only pass-through requests are involved, no original issue in
>> scsi_execute() at all.
>>
>> 2) when only one request queue is attached to tags, no necessary to
>> call synchronize_rcu() too.
>>
>> Without this patch, it may take more 20+ seconds for virtio-scsi to
>> complete disk probe. With this patch, the time becomes less than 100ms.
>>
>> Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++--
>> block/blk-mq.c | 5 ++++-
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index cf0ee764b908..f0129e20b773 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -766,9 +766,13 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>> * make sure all in-progress dispatch are completed because
>> * blk_freeze_queue() can only complete all requests, and
>> * dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests
>> - * from more than one contexts
>> + * from more than one contexts.
>> + *
>> + * No need to quiesce queue if it isn't initialized yet since
>> + * blk_freeze_queue() should be enough for cases of passthrough
>> + * request.
>> */
>> - if (q->mq_ops)
>> + if (q->mq_ops && blk_queue_init_done(q))
>> blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
>>
>> /* for synchronous bio-based driver finish in-flight integrity i/o */
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 70c65bb6c013..63680b243466 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -2351,6 +2351,7 @@ static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>> static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
>> {
>> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>> + bool shared = true;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
>> list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
>> @@ -2359,9 +2360,11 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
>> set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
>> /* update existing queue */
>> blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false);
>> + shared = true;
>
> I guess this should be '= false'.
>
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
>> - synchronize_rcu();
>> + if (shared)
>> + synchronize_rcu();
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list);
>> }
>>
>
> With the '= false' change I tested this and it resolves the issue for me.
That logic still doesn't look correct to me. Does the below work?
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index afd2596ea3d3..222d4fc0e524 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -762,9 +762,13 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* make sure all in-progress dispatch are completed because
* blk_freeze_queue() can only complete all requests, and
* dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests
- * from more than one contexts
+ * from more than one contexts.
+ *
+ * No need to quiesce queue if it isn't initialized yet since
+ * blk_freeze_queue() should be enough for cases of passthrough
+ * request.
*/
- if (q->mq_ops)
+ if (q->mq_ops && blk_queue_init_done(q))
blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
/* for synchronous bio-based driver finish in-flight integrity i/o */
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 8e57b84e50e9..18ad2b95ff63 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2351,8 +2351,12 @@ static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
{
struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
+ bool shared;
mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
+ shared = !list_is_singular(&set->tag_list);
+
list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) {
/* just transitioned to unshared */
@@ -2361,7 +2365,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
- synchronize_rcu();
+ if (shared)
+ synchronize_rcu();
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list);
}
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 2:55 [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid to synchronize rcu inside blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2018-06-22 11:42 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-22 14:58 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-06-22 21:31 ` Ming Lei
2018-06-22 22:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-22 14:47 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-22 21:33 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8024ab9d-ae82-c8f2-83e3-a9d8fa4ba303@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.