From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Separate out x86_regset for 32 and 64 bit
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:42:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80b0882f77d267293ea8b8d040bffe6032e1285e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5f9ce3c70d202834e0a76ed30966e2c81eb28dc.camel@intel.com>
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 12:06 -0700, Edgecombe, Richard P wrote:
> But even adding a comment to the base file has surprisingly wide
> effects. It caused the __bug_table section table to get code
> generated
> with different instructions, not just line numbers constants
> changing.
Err... I suppose this is probably because they are not actually
instructions and so should be expected, duh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 20:17 [PATCH 0/3] Regset cleanups Rick Edgecombe
2022-03-15 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: Separate out x86_regset for 32 and 64 bit Rick Edgecombe
2022-03-15 20:41 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-15 21:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-16 2:48 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-16 19:06 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-16 19:42 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2022-03-16 19:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-15 23:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-03-15 23:33 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-15 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: Improve formatting of user_regset arrays Rick Edgecombe
2022-03-15 20:38 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-15 21:48 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-15 20:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] elf: Don't write past end of notes for regset gap Rick Edgecombe
2022-03-15 20:37 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-15 21:48 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-16 2:48 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80b0882f77d267293ea8b8d040bffe6032e1285e.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.