From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Stephens Subject: Re: Fix per-directory exclude handing for "git add" Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:05:20 +0000 Message-ID: <80ve82z0wf.fsf@tiny.isode.net> References: <80ir431xny.fsf@tiny.isode.net> <80ir43e04o.fsf@tiny.isode.net> <7vir4341ok.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vodduzh36.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <80y7cy2tay.fsf@tiny.isode.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 16 16:06:31 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1It2lP-0007hW-KS for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:05:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751496AbXKPPFa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:05:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752011AbXKPPFa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:05:30 -0500 Received: from rufus.isode.com ([62.3.217.251]:40530 "EHLO rufus.isode.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032AbXKPPF3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:05:29 -0500 Received: from tiny.isode.net (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (smtp internal) via TCP with SMTP id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:05:22 +0000 Received: by tiny.isode.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:05:20 +0000 X-Hashcash: 1:20:071116:gitster@pobox.com::vyr6QLZtK3ziezzC:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000B/J+ X-Hashcash: 1:20:071116:torvalds@linux-foundation.org::4PQvkWG1D0i21Qki:000000000000000000000000000000009VSL X-Hashcash: 1:20:071116:git@vger.kernel.org::FIFOYpwvDYcG5gNn:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000006yOl User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Bruce Stephens writes: [...] > I guess really the output of "git status" (or "git runstatus") is > more significant since that's what we'd normally be running (that's > presumably what "git gui" and similar tools run, though perhaps they > use "git ls-files"---probably the underlying code's the same, I > guess). Bah. "git status" also works correctly, I think. I was just testing stupidly. [...]