From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ying Fang <fangying1@huawei.com>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
"wangzhigang17@huawei.com" <wangzhigang17@huawei.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel \(ARM address\)" <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
philmd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Question on UEFI ACPI tables setup and probing on arm64
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:09:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <813efc59-2ce4-e2be-894f-e48ca66ce603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5310d14d-8dbe-ba97-fdf1-4f3f10f91f3a@huawei.com>
On 11/05/20 05:30, Ying Fang wrote:
> I see it in Qemu the *loader_start* is fixed at 1 GiB on the
> physical address space which points to the DRAM base. In ArmVirtQemu.dsc
> PcdDeviceTreeInitialBaseAddress is set 0x40000000 with correspondence.
>
> Here I also see the discussion about DRAM base for ArmVirtQemu.
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg03127.html
>
> I am still not sure how UEFI knows that it is running on a ArmVirtQemu
> machine type.
It doesn't know. It remains a convention.
This part is not auto-detected; the constants in QEMU and edk2 are
independently open-coded, their values were synchronized by human effort
initially.
The user or the management layer have to make sure they boot a UEFI
firmware binary on the machine type that is compatible with the machine
type.
There is some meta-data to help with that:
> Does UEFI derive it from the fdt *compatible* property ?
Please see the schema "docs/interop/firmware.json" in the QEMU tree; in
particular the @FirmwareTarget element.
For an actual example: QEMU bundles some edk2 firmware binaries (purely
as a convenience, not for production), and those are accompanied by
matching descriptor files. See
"pc-bios/descriptors/60-edk2-aarch64.json". (It is a template that's
fixed up during QEMU installation, but that's tangential here.)
"targets": [
{
"architecture": "aarch64",
"machines": [
"virt-*"
]
}
],
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 2:50 Question on UEFI ACPI tables setup and probing on arm64 Ying Fang
2020-11-03 12:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-11-04 21:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-04 21:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-05 4:30 ` Ying Fang
2020-11-06 17:09 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-11-10 1:42 ` Ying Fang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=813efc59-2ce4-e2be-894f-e48ca66ce603@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=fangying1@huawei.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangzhigang17@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.