From: Walter Harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-man@vger.kernel.org" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: AW: [PATCH v2 2/3] loop.4: add some details about lo_flag
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:39:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81fa86757a3e463f8e103f23e06ab67e@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ba1ca61-cf3d-0103-d3de-b3bc6e8bd0af@cn.fujitsu.com>
ok, i understand now (i hope).
maybe this version is more clear:
The LOOP_SET_STATUS can neither set the
.B lo_flags
LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY nor the LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO
because they are exclusively set from kernel.
hope that helps
wh
________________________________________
Von: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org [linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org] im Auftrag von Yang Xu [xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. August 2020 08:53
An: Walter Harms; linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH v2 2/3] loop.4: add some details about lo_flag
Hi Walter
> Hi,
> IMHO "first" and "last" is something that should be avoided in documentation
> because the meaning may change in future releases.
Thanks, I see.
> I guess you want to say: lo_number and reserved ?
No, I just said the loop_set_status ioctl can not set read-only and
direct io flag.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>
> re,
> wh
> ________________________________________
> Von: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org [linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org] im Auftrag von Yang Xu [xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2020 11:48
> An: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Yang Xu
> Betreff: [PATCH v2 2/3] loop.4: add some details about lo_flag
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> man4/loop.4 | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/man4/loop.4 b/man4/loop.4
> index 1f8a31ac7..41abe0122 100644
> --- a/man4/loop.4
> +++ b/man4/loop.4
> @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ Allow automatic partition scanning.
> Use direct io mode to access backing file.
> .RE
> .TP
> +.I The LOOP_SET_STATUS can not set the first and last flag because
> +they are both set from kernel.
> +.TP
> .B LOOP_GET_STATUS
> Get the status of the loop device.
> The (third)
> --
> 2.23.0
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-06 9:48 [PATCH v2 1/3] loop.4: Document LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO flag Yang Xu
2020-08-06 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] loop.4: add some details about lo_flag Yang Xu
2020-08-07 7:36 ` AW: " Walter Harms
2020-08-10 6:53 ` Yang Xu
2020-08-10 7:39 ` Walter Harms [this message]
2020-09-08 9:55 ` AW: " Yang Xu
2020-09-09 9:06 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-09-09 11:17 ` Yang Xu
2020-08-06 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] loop.4: Document loop_configure ioctl Yang Xu
2020-09-09 9:17 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-09-09 11:20 ` Yang Xu
2020-09-09 9:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] loop.4: Document LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO flag Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81fa86757a3e463f8e103f23e06ab67e@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.