From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
yanaijie@huawei.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, mkp@kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com,
kangfenglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: libsas: Fix SMP IO deadlock during HA resume
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:40:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <820657c2-1cbd-47d8-92f2-477531692135@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928040234.992912-1-yangxingui@huawei.com>
On 9/28/26 05:02, Xingui Yang wrote:
> smp_execute_task_sg() calls pm_runtime_get_sync() on the host before
> issuing an SMP command. When that command is itself issued from the
> HA resume path, the get_sync() deadlocks: it waits for the ongoing
> resume (the device is RPM_RESUMING), while the resume is blocked in
> sas_drain_work() waiting for that same SMP IO to complete.
>
> The deadlock needs an expander-attached SATA disk.
What do you mean by "deadlock needs an expander-attached SATA disk?
> During
> sas_resume_ha() -> sas_drain_work(), DISCE_RESUME ->
> sas_resume_sata() -> ata_sas_port_resume() requests ATA_EH_RESET,
> and the hard reset for such a disk is done via SMP PHY CONTROL
> (sas_ata_hard_reset() -> sas_phy_reset() -> sas_smp_phy_control() ->
> smp_execute_task_sg()). Direct-attached SATA resets through
> lldd_control_phy() and SSP devices use TMFs, so neither hits this.
>
> Replace the get_sync()/put_sync() pair with
> pm_runtime_get_noresume()/pm_runtime_put(). smp_execute_task_sg()
> only needs to hold off autosuspend while the SMP is in flight, and it
> must not try to resume the host: a sync resume issued from the HA
> resume path itself is what deadlocks, and by the time sas_resume_ha()
> runs, hw_init has already reinitialized the hardware, so the device
> is accessible without one.
>
> The usage reference is still required.
Do you mean that usage reference from pm_runtime_get_noresume() is still
required?
> Discovery work normally runs
> inside an event worker's PM reference, taken at
> sas_notify_port_event() notify time and held until the handler has
> flushed the disco queue. sas_rediscover_ex_phy() however requeues
> DISCE_REVALIDATE_DOMAIN from within the revalidation worker itself,
> and flush_workqueue() does not wait for work items queued during
> execution, so that chained revalidation runs with no outer PM
> reference - without the get_noresume(), its SMP could race
> autosuspend.
>
> For the BSG path, sas_smp_handler() is the only caller which may
> find the host autosuspended: expander SMP requests do not go through
> any SCSI device request queue, so nothing else in that path holds
> the host awake. Resume it there with pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
> and check the result.
>
> Fixes: 3dbbbf656b850 ("scsi: libsas: Fix HA resume deadlock and hisi_sas disk-wake race")
> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
Question: do you have a (non-hisi_sas) SAS HBA card whose driver uses
libsas? pm8001 would be such an example. It would be nice to verify that
all these and other non-rpm libsas changes does cause regression there.
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Move the host resume to sas_smp_handler(), the only caller which may
> find the host autosuspended, as suggested by John Garry
> - Replace get_sync()/put_sync() with get_noresume()/put() in
> smp_execute_task_sg(): a blocking resume issued from the HA resume
> path itself is what deadlocks
> - Drop the racy SAS_HA_RESUMING check
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Drop the reference with pm_runtime_put() instead of
> pm_runtime_put_noidle().
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Use pm_runtime_get_noresume()/put_noidle() during HA resume instead
> of skipping the PM reference entirely, so an in-flight SMP IO always
> keeps autosuspend away.
> - Convert pm_runtime_get_sync() to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and
> check the result (pre-existing issue flagged by sashiko).
>
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> index 811c9eb4fef1..26c2099c28b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,11 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
> to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->shost->transportt);
> struct sas_ha_struct *ha = dev->port->ha;
>
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
> + /*
> + * Non-blocking: a sync resume here would deadlock against
> + * sas_drain_work() during HA resume.
> + */
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(ha->dev);
> mutex_lock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
> for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state)) {
> @@ -135,7 +139,7 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
> }
> }
> mutex_unlock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(ha->dev);
>
> BUG_ON(retry == 3 && task != NULL);
> sas_free_task(task);
> @@ -2222,6 +2226,11 @@ void sas_smp_handler(struct bsg_job *job, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* The host may have autosuspended, resume it here. */
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev->port->ha->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> ret = smp_execute_task_sg(dev, job->request_payload.sg_list,
> job->reply_payload.sg_list);
> if (ret >= 0) {
> @@ -2229,6 +2238,7 @@ void sas_smp_handler(struct bsg_job *job, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> rcvlen = job->reply_payload.payload_len - ret;
> ret = 0;
> }
> + pm_runtime_put(dev->port->ha->dev);
>
> out:
> bsg_job_done(job, ret, rcvlen);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 4:02 [PATCH v4] scsi: libsas: Fix SMP IO deadlock during HA resume Xingui Yang
2026-09-28 4:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 7:30 ` yangxingui
2026-09-30 10:40 ` John Garry [this message]
2026-10-08 3:11 ` yangxingui
2026-10-14 12:18 ` John Garry
2026-10-15 3:02 ` Martin K. Petersen (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=820657c2-1cbd-47d8-92f2-477531692135@linux.dev \
--to=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.