From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 1690/4884] drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c:397:15: error: call to undeclared function 'drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 11:51:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8213929.2l3rmUXbR5@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202312051333.Z0rH44Jk-lkp@intel.com>
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2023, 06:42:51 CET schrieb kernel test robot:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 0f5f12ac05f36f117e793656c3f560625e927f1b
> commit: ae3436a5e7c2ef4f92938133bd99f92fc47ea34e [1690/4884] drm/rockchip: rk3066_hdmi: Switch encoder hooks to atomic
> config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20231204 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231205/202312051333.Z0rH44Jk-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231205/202312051333.Z0rH44Jk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312051333.Z0rH44Jk-lkp@intel.com/
This is already fixed via commit
f4814c20d14c ("drm/rockchip: rk3066_hdmi: include drm/drm_atomic.h")
from 2023-11-22
Heiko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 5:42 [linux-next:master 1690/4884] drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c:397:15: error: call to undeclared function 'drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
2023-12-05 10:51 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8213929.2l3rmUXbR5@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.