From: "Mallesh, Koujalagi" <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
To: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:38:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82884f13-e5de-4ab8-8723-beecbf764965@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012051823.2201360-13-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
On 12-10-2026 10:48 am, Dnyaneshwar Bhadane wrote:
> Replace drm_err()/drm_info() with xe_log_err_fatal()/xe_log_info()
> using the VRAM component tag. The "no CPU visible VRAM" error uses
> tile or device as the log location depending on the caller context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
>
> ---
> v2:
> - Update the ternary condition (Mallesh)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> index 73aef047eb38..772704dfe12f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include "xe_device.h"
> #include "xe_force_wake.h"
> #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
> +#include "xe_log.h"
> #include "xe_map.h"
> #include "xe_migrate.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> @@ -46,7 +47,8 @@ static int determine_lmem_bar_size(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vram_region *
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
>
> if (!resource_is_valid(pdev, LMEM_BAR)) {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "pci resource is not valid\n");
> + xe_log_err_fatal(xe, VRAM, -ENXIO,
> + "PCI resource is not valid\n");
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> @@ -227,17 +229,16 @@ struct xe_vram_region *xe_vram_region_alloc(struct xe_device *xe, u8 id, u32 pla
>
> static void print_vram_region_info(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vram_region *vram)
> {
> - struct drm_device *drm = &xe->drm;
>
> if (vram->io_size < vram->usable_size)
> - drm_info(drm, "Small BAR device\n");
> -
> - drm_info(drm,
> - "VRAM[%u]: Actual physical size %pa, usable size exclude stolen %pa, CPU accessible size %pa\n",
> - vram->id, &vram->actual_physical_size, &vram->usable_size, &vram->io_size);
> - drm_info(drm, "VRAM[%u]: DPA range: [%pa-%llx], io range: [%pa-%llx]\n",
> - vram->id, &vram->dpa_base, vram->dpa_base + (u64)vram->actual_physical_size,
> - &vram->io_start, vram->io_start + (u64)vram->io_size);
> + xe_log_info(xe, VRAM, "Small BAR device\n");
> +
> + xe_log_info(xe, VRAM,
> + "[%u]: Actual physical size %pa, usable size exclude stolen %pa, CPU accessible size %pa\n",
> + vram->id, &vram->actual_physical_size, &vram->usable_size, &vram->io_size);
> + xe_log_info(xe, VRAM, "[%u]: DPA range: [%pa-%llx], io range: [%pa-%llx]\n",
> + vram->id, &vram->dpa_base, vram->dpa_base + (u64)vram->actual_physical_size,
> + &vram->io_start, vram->io_start + (u64)vram->io_size);
> }
>
> static int vram_region_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vram_region *vram,
> @@ -255,8 +256,14 @@ static int vram_region_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vram_region *vram,
> vram->io_size = min_t(u64, usable_size, remain_io_size);
>
> if (!vram->io_size) {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "%s without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n",
> - tile ? "Tile" : "Device");
> + if (tile) {
> + xe_log_err_fatal(tile, VRAM, -ENODEV,
> + "without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n");
Rephrase the message, out put looks like:
<3> xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=108 FATAL (-ENODEV) Tile0:
VRAM: without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.
> + } else {
> + xe_log_err_fatal(xe, VRAM, -ENODEV,
> + "without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n");
Device is required right? and rephrase the message.
> + }
> +
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -321,7 +328,7 @@ int xe_vram_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> err = determine_lmem_bar_size(xe, &lmem_bar);
> if (err)
> return err;
> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "VISIBLE VRAM: %pa, %pa\n", &lmem_bar.io_start, &lmem_bar.io_size);
> + xe_log_info(xe, VRAM, "VISIBLE VRAM: %pa, %pa\n", &lmem_bar.io_start, &lmem_bar.io_size);
>
> remain_io_size = lmem_bar.io_size;
>
> @@ -343,8 +350,9 @@ int xe_vram_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> return err;
>
> if (total_size > lmem_bar.io_size) {
> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "VRAM: %pa is larger than resource %pa\n",
> - &total_size, &lmem_bar.io_size);
> + xe_log_info(xe, VRAM,
> + "Total size %pa is larger than resource %pa\n",
> + &total_size, &lmem_bar.io_size);
> }
>
> remain_io_size -= min_t(u64, tile->mem.vram->actual_physical_size, remain_io_size);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 5:18 [PATCH v6 00/12] drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] drm/xe/log: Add VRAM, PAT, and HWMON DRIVER_HARDWARE components Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] drm/xe/ggtt: Report GGTT errors using structured logging Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] drm/xe/hwmon: Report errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: Report BAR mapping " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] drm/xe/memirq: Report " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] drm/xe/pat: Return error from xe_pat_init_early() on unknown platform Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] drm/xe/pat: Report missing PAT table using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] drm/xe/pci: Report unknown GMDID versions " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] drm/xe/lmtt: Report invalidation errors " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] drm/xe/vram: Report tile vs device VRAM visibility errors Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 9:01 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-12 5:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 9:08 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi [this message]
2026-10-12 5:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API (rev6) Patchwork
2026-10-12 6:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-12 7:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82884f13-e5de-4ab8-8723-beecbf764965@intel.com \
--to=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.