From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Thumshirn Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: vpd pages are mandatory for SPC-2 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:45:24 +0200 Message-ID: <832f9d5b74da45871e43175b98daacca@suse.de> References: <1459493857-4724-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1459493857-4724-3-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35913 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751947AbcDAHp0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:45:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1459493857-4724-3-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org On 2016-04-01 08:57, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > VPD pages 0x0 and 0x83 are mandatory even for SPC-2, so we should > be lowering the restriction to avoid having to whitelist every > SPC-2 compliant device. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke Looks good, Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn