From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.12 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792917001; b=MJnxoNU8Ibbd6pmvkLfRGfmOkMMMiki0l7J9AueQWU8etlKMd54aDoFL9uSyY0wbOabA 6zN3fZVvCkiqIL6x9WoKR3WLVbrlnzDPIVZQ5biUtaz56e78u3c0QAZ6BSrFLifyqoGK7 jaKVLX+RjH/IRoJ8vTVJpj/R8qBB2seuY9IBdf4ae2RAnG0WOAPPQkDsq1YEVdNkBYx5H k3rZ+5Dy0zls7ZBTQPGZI7KQXsgKW7b0IEeeT0GpMIIStD0podRe3LZu2mbf0UWRrgMbl Vbl22ytrFVoutZZlkT6B3K1BPwDEg5J3Tf7TRPP4gTd9xw6AP1W0xWVXQu7FLpm6w3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792917001; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:MIME-Version:Date:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:TLS-Required:Subject:To: In-Reply-To:References; bh=aIlnLoJ4Y0Z0xK1aVyqwtJoyLmThHPvvVkpW2bgAwjk=; b=imVL9VWUcU29oruOvcpA6UN3C+HsMxE33gl/VTX4eVardqCzGIc46Km1DcVEvnOZGeXp 5gmR31yrN5/licd2LYAYNl1jKk2QQTsuUQiCcgbVXD6EjSubjbejptnttmwVKY08q77mr bKO/JgUmkCZvo8FV0xXyjA0Z1snFxyUbqYNysNy8vRn2UTq5ucoZrImSZcFysJ5HuCwQg ZXEpnS7mf5WfXf4EIjxzUdV2rTYJPPjkeW20VjFBnRUcOThYdpqbk2C6AgQyfHPvEdLwE /B7R9t8dlrA3+tUvrMsnxrJ4eWwddI2yNvCG/Uzw3bQNnrFpWZ9B5lZWMr2pMz3Xctg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b="TOVW/vBu"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.12 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-12.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8965B606A31A for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 08:30:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 8965B606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=TOVW/vBu X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=v0JL44eMZ8rFkgWng4B5IzytzYgPVW6l+D7dKj8oM8w=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792916998; v=1; x=1793521798; b=TOVW/vBuYop6oQTWrOi8Zh5reicWZCOsRXPKSaoPgRLCtg4+H+FUTZbt14xTgmuSvl2Iwlsm lME/5hg4D/8xX/KzHq6WlpvNCjP9qHSXyzSj95iPdggvJvKmz2ZCsC/sle/vCgigM64LdLiO8/H pCa0EVTpWoq6xr6eeQmSYbUQ= X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 24a1db5822e08f63; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 08:29:58 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 24a1db5822e08f63 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 08:29:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Luka Gejak" Message-ID: <8331a75e3ee92551eaa9256be8329a843d7bc184@linux.dev> TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw88: 8723d: add iface combination To: "Ping-Ke Shih" , "Carl Quist" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <836925ba243944dbbc74a713d63d74c7@realtek.com> References: <20261023201724.68885-1-equalizerjr@gmail.com> <836925ba243944dbbc74a713d63d74c7@realtek.com> October 25, 2026 at 3:38 AM, "Ping-Ke Shih" wrote: >=20 >=20Carl Quist wrote: >=20 >=20>=20 >=20> Would you be fine with sending v2 as it is, with the commit message > > stating exactly what was and was not tested? Or would you rather wai= t > > until someone with a sniffer can run your checks? > >=20 >=20With your tests from user point of view, I think it is okay. That'd b= e > good if someone can capture a sniffer and analyze it, but that isn't > a blocking item to merge this patch. Please follow Luka's suggestions > to spin v2.=20 I=20can test v2 on rtl8723du and another card as a sniffer if that helps = :) >=20 >=20>=20 >=20> If there is a way to > > check any of those points with a single adapter, I am happy to try i= t. > >=20 >=20I think no. Driver isn't aware that packets sent by firmware/hardware= . >=20 >=20Ping-Ke >