From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFED71A84 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:14:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2018 03:14:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,334,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="43628319" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2018 03:14:13 -0700 To: "Burton, Ross" , akuster808 References: From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <833712e4-00aa-1e05-8df5-a0f9a18d4e29@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:07:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFt5b2N0b10gWW9jdG8gUHJvamVjdCBTdGF0dXMgV1cxMuKAmTE4?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:14:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 03/19/2018 10:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Do we have a place identified for new changes (2.6) while 2.5 > stabilizes. > > > A formal place, no.  I tend to queue stuff in a branch if master isn't > taking all of my energy, otherwise the patches will sit on the list > until 2.5 releases.  Typically master and sumo branches won't diverge > until post-release. Which brings me to a question: what is a good schedule and cadence for AUH runs? Currently it's run on the 15th of every odd-numbered month (so January, March, and so on), but I thought of shifting it one month forward, so it doesn't land right in the middle of a feature freeze. Thoughts? Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9E5E9E009CF; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [134.134.136.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E96E00547 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2018 03:14:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,334,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="43628319" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2018 03:14:13 -0700 To: "Burton, Ross" , akuster808 References: From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <833712e4-00aa-1e05-8df5-a0f9a18d4e29@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:07:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPRS1jb3JlXSBZb2N0byBQcm9qZWN0IFN0YXR1cyBXVzEy4oCZMTg=?= X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:14:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 03/19/2018 10:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Do we have a place identified for new changes (2.6) while 2.5 > stabilizes. > > > A formal place, no.  I tend to queue stuff in a branch if master isn't > taking all of my energy, otherwise the patches will sit on the list > until 2.5 releases.  Typically master and sumo branches won't diverge > until post-release. Which brings me to a question: what is a good schedule and cadence for AUH runs? Currently it's run on the 15th of every odd-numbered month (so January, March, and so on), but I thought of shifting it one month forward, so it doesn't land right in the middle of a feature freeze. Thoughts? Alex