From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:32:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8341946.9jZiCPfkKB@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYuxJ2CWQGDCWx+4Yp2r3=OVunyx2kfTyBKay43jaHvnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:40:48 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > Arnd Bergmann (3):
> > ARM: gemini: get platform to build again
> > ARM: gemini: remove platform support
> > ARM: remove fa526 CPU support
>
> Arnd: I suggest you rebase and apply this series, sans the FA526
> removal as I hear it may now be used on the Moxart.
>
> I patched the generic time code for gemini in october last year
> and noone has yet bothered to even test it!
I guess you mean just the middle patch then? The first one
was actually applied.
On the other hand, I did make a patch now to enable multiplatform
support for gemini that I was planning to send for review.
Florian, what is the status of gemini in openwrt? From what I can
tell, it's stuck at linux-3.9 [1], which is probably why nobody has
tested Linus' timer code. It's not clear if anyone is still interested
in it, but I also don't see a reason why any of the patches in
the openwrt repository couldn't just get merged (with some trivial
changes in a few cases).
Arnd
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=history;f=target/linux/gemini/patches;h=b58795e82765935eba3f001c39c8e4ca8c3c549e;hb=HEAD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 14:41 [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 1/3] ARM: gemini: get platform to build again Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 2/3] ARM: gemini: remove platform support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 3/3] ARM: remove fa526 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-09 8:40 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-09 9:32 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 1/3] ARM: gemini: get platform to build again Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 2/3] ARM: gemini: remove platform support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 3/3] ARM: remove fa526 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 15:30 ` [PATCH, RFC 1/3] ARM: gemini: get platform to build again Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 15:30 ` [PATCH, RFC 2/3] ARM: gemini: remove platform support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 15:30 ` [PATCH, RFC 3/3] ARM: remove fa526 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 13:00 ` [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8341946.9jZiCPfkKB@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.