From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792895944; b=KvLd7nnRxOpnTmo4j4PW2dmtGL2VRbW7ed1Z5lRDcgXakUXhXCfPJhJ073wE7Uztht3i txCMfiPn/Cw+j6y356s0VJ3GI1W5dO19HUwC5T2llxLpGT5LYUgV6hYQG7gjTn4G2qQCK 244rP8KJ+4tux6PjLaz6EJ8WRfy00pc7CK1Qdqmuhs5gUOI/HCShkIy6RniFJ0glhYKiS a1JyLJFilgNxsRqiAJTKMKF845irj0kj321lgRb6iCjM/RcGjXgPZ75eEzLxUBuJu58GR YXmaIWvqxP3XmcH+XRG2ZSab+Rc1IusgnSc5JX6UOOK+Hvr4uI88znmQm40opARoLJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792895944; h=DMARC-Filter:X-SpamFilter-By:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received: Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=5+rcXnkncmR9+nniaBameWEiznbJoGRs8K09Cg60KjE=; b=vZ08HkJmUO7ENUwEQkcxcAByVfNaNWCa63iFhj5B1B5thvT41D2o72XraVhPRmQAXnns cHA06zWKcQ9I7vxScOcCMTW/tsyDqDW4ce94DiH56i73nwbYz/nhq9GLOkGXfQAG4i5WZ xMH0lYkI6FwJqEaia3aZydrlgLEn/rBGHIUDwrBTKUughKp7NP+kPsKlI1BucnrsPw/TV GfsB1xOz80PPkMmx+15XFzQt81Cj7qSLf4KGzJE2w3v+kxRyPwQ9mIdT6JPT3vRBMa+Px qZbh9Q2scu+qNhJOnvF0kvIdNzTAjFnuxo1jdI64RRypMuCezM9xx9Iicq7/gv1x9gg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; dkim=pass header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=LLEzIOWa; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=211.75.126.72 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA47606A31A for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:39:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 6AA47606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=LLEzIOWa X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.80 with qID 69P2cwryF3142223, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=realtek.com; s=dkim; t=1792895938; bh=5+rcXnkncmR9+nniaBameWEiznbJoGRs8K09Cg60KjE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=LLEzIOWafZYjov9sxOotW3MOG0BRmwck0jEgKHPx3Qohml6yChtiWQ67Sc5F5h3qj DXJ2e/Dr4ByLcA7DUbsiFMJ/0GEJS9WTSGSHnI4VJjr49E37yIC96S1roPoaLSGuO+ 5Gm9bC0UVAl7m74x3cbhiWlGBGMm4hWaTcmXZXT151fBfgURYgBtLCdQ7OpfA33ENU e6aAetKNYZWd9kntcUOIpR0bUIoY6G3RHvR/CaYnSWEcgMhqRUY39VArEahbfjxn9O xv8ow66TluubPDHG7HYPfBBjg3WNanvIJ459zkxrL1nq46p7VG8eEBSU9L+ClVheoe +jVqCI9Z1vfpA== Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtkexhmbs04.realtek.com.tw[10.21.1.54]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/3.29/5.94) with ESMTPS id 69P2cwryF3142223 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:38:58 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS05.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.55) by RTKEXHMBS04.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.49; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:38:59 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.56) by RTKEXHMBS05.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.49; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:38:58 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([::1]) by RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::b3cc:c263:b82d:e87c%10]) with mapi id 15.02.2562.049; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:38:58 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Carl Quist , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw88: 8723d: add iface combination Thread-Topic: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw88: 8723d: add iface combination Thread-Index: AQHdXbduQ6aiRpZMH0mQK6ZTehenWbcBBocAgAAhaACAAvMr4IAG+mIAgAKBbKA= Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:38:58 +0000 Message-ID: <836925ba243944dbbc74a713d63d74c7@realtek.com> References: <20261023201724.68885-1-equalizerjr@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20261023201724.68885-1-equalizerjr@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Carl Quist wrote: > Would you be fine with sending v2 as it is, with the commit message > stating exactly what was and was not tested? Or would you rather wait > until someone with a sniffer can run your checks?=20 With your tests from user point of view, I think it is okay. That'd be good if someone can capture a sniffer and analyze it, but that isn't a blocking item to merge this patch. Please follow Luka's suggestions to spin v2.=20 > If there is a way to > check any of those points with a single adapter, I am happy to try it. I think no. Driver isn't aware that packets sent by firmware/hardware. Ping-Ke