From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/bo: mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:02:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ed0bf4-9833-8bf2-41ff-638035e71bd3@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211185835.GA19174@embeddedor>
Hi,
Please drop this, as I have included this fix into
the following patch, which addresses all the
expected fall-throughs in drivers/gpu/drm:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1042856/
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/11/19 12:58 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c: In function ‘nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1434:53: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1438:2: note: here
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> /* untiled */
> break;
> - /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
> + /* fall through - tiled memory */
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> reg->bus.offset = reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> reg->bus.base = device->func->resource_addr(device, 1);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 18:58 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/bo: mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-15 16:02 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2019-02-15 17:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83ed0bf4-9833-8bf2-41ff-638035e71bd3@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.