From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sarthak Garg <quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
quic_cang@quicinc.com, quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com,
quic_rampraka@quicinc.com, quic_pragalla@quicinc.com,
quic_sayalil@quicinc.com, quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com,
quic_bhaskarv@quicinc.com, kernel@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] dt-bindings: mmc: controller: Add max-sd-hs-frequency property
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:30:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83f88dd5-8c74-4c2f-b94e-6c16dcbd44f1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6117473-fa38-48db-94a1-892b76abc10f@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 01/07/2025 11:04, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at the docs, a number of platforms have various limitations
>>>>> with regards to frequency at specific speed-modes, some of which seem
>>>>> to be handled implicitly by rounding in the clock framework's
>>>>> round/set_rate().
>>>>>
>>>>> I can very easily imagine there are either boards or platforms in the
>>>>> wild, where the speed must be limited for various reasons, maybe some
>>>>> of them currently don't advertise it (like sm8550 on next/master) to
>>>>> hide that
>>>>
>>>> But there are no such now. The only argument (fact) provided in this
>>>> patchset is: this is issue specific to SM8550 SoC, not the board. See
>>>> last patch. Therefore this is compatible-deducible and this makes
>>>> property without any upstream user.
>>>
>>> When one appears, we will have to carry code to repeat what the property
>>> does, based on a specific compatible.. And all OS implementations will
>>> have to do the same, instead of parsing the explicit information
>>
>> Adding new property in such case will be trivial and simple, unlike
>> having to maintain unused ABI.
>>
>> And it will be unused, because last patch DTS should be rejected on that
>> basis: adding redundant properties which are already defined by the
>> compatible.
>
> Got some more fresh information.. This apparently *does* vary across
> boards, as there is a recommended hardware workaround to this rate
> limitation (requiring an external clock source, which is up to the
> OEM to implement or not)
This should be clearly explained in commit msg and the DTS patch
re-written because it seems it is not a property of the SoC.
I mean, really, that last patch here makes entire discussion pointless,
because till it is in the patchset is a proof this is a SoC level property.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 7:28 [PATCH V3 0/4] Add level shifter support for qualcomm SOC's Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 7:28 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable tuning for SDR50 mode for SD card Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 7:28 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] dt-bindings: mmc: controller: Add max-sd-hs-frequency property Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 7:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-18 8:38 ` Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 9:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-20 9:07 ` Sarthak Garg
2025-06-21 10:20 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-22 9:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-23 12:08 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-23 12:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-23 12:31 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-24 6:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-01 9:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-07-01 9:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-07-24 11:48 ` Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 7:28 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] mmc: core: Introduce a new flag max-sd-hs-frequency Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 7:28 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Remove SDR104/SDR50 broken capabilities Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 7:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-18 8:44 ` Sarthak Garg
2025-06-18 9:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-21 10:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83f88dd5-8c74-4c2f-b94e-6c16dcbd44f1@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_bhaskarv@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pragalla@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rampraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sayalil@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.