From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>
To: linux-os@analogic.com
Cc: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() - fs/ext2/
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:50:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020503252350550cd23b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503251726010.6354@chaos.analogic.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:29:56 -0500 (EST), linux-os
<linux-os@analogic.com> wrote:
> Isn't it expensive of CPU time to call kfree() even though the
> pointer may have already been freed? I suggest that the check
> for a NULL before the call is much less expensive than calling
> kfree() and doing the check there. The resulting "double check"
> is cheap, compared to the call.
Resource release paths are usually not performance critical. However,
if removing the redundant checks introduce a _measurable_ regressions
in terms of performance, we can make kfree() inline which will take
care of it.
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-26 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 22:08 [PATCH] no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() - fs/ext2/ Jesper Juhl
2005-03-25 22:29 ` linux-os
2005-03-25 22:44 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-26 7:50 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2005-03-26 8:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-26 23:21 ` [PATCH] no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() -fs/ext2/ linux-os
2005-03-26 23:34 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-03-27 2:00 ` Horst von Brand
2005-03-27 3:18 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-03-27 22:12 ` linux-os
2005-03-26 23:54 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-27 0:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-27 10:55 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-27 14:56 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-27 15:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-27 17:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-27 18:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-27 19:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-03-27 22:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-28 4:53 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-30 18:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-28 1:20 ` Horst von Brand
2005-03-28 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-28 12:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-03-29 2:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-29 6:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-03-29 7:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-29 7:24 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-03-30 2:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-30 6:13 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-03-30 6:16 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-30 7:15 ` P Lavin
2005-03-30 14:20 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-30 19:10 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-04-09 2:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-28 4:07 ` [PATCH] " Paul Jackson
2005-03-27 8:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-27 12:51 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-27 14:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-27 23:13 ` [PATCH] no need to check for NULL before calling kfree()-fs/ext2/ linux-os
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020503252350550cd23b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.