From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:26:37 +0300 Message-ID: <84144f0205062223266ab40243@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <42B831B4.9020603@pobox.com> <42B87318.80607@namesys.com> <20050621202448.GB30182@infradead.org> <42B8B9EE.7020002@namesys.com> <42B8BB5E.8090008@pobox.com> <42B8E834.5030809@slaphack.com> <42B8F4BC.5060100@pobox.com> <42BA4F7E.6000402@namesys.com> Reply-To: Pekka Enberg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42BA4F7E.6000402@namesys.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Jeff Garzik , David Masover , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List , Pekka Enberg Hi Hans, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > We have to maintain said ugly code for decades. On 6/23/05, Hans Reiser wrote: > No you don't, I do. Lots of people work on the kernel. If you wish to keep reiser4 maintenance to yourself, you probably need to keep it as a separate patch. Please consider submitting the non-controversial bits for merging first and then continue with the rest. It does not make a lot of sense reviewing the current patchkit as many parts of it won't be merged as is (e.g. the plugin stuff). Pekka