From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] pci: split match and probe function
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 23:08:09 +0100
Message-ID: <8436806.F4O5ETrAb8@xps13>
References: <1482756644-13726-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-8-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: david.marchand@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org
To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59E23777
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2017 23:08:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a197so395140473wmd.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:08:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1482758645-23057-8-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-12-26 18:54, Shreyansh Jain:
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> @@ -373,6 +373,21 @@ rte_eal_compare_pci_addr(const struct rte_pci_addr *addr,
>  int rte_eal_pci_scan(void);
>  
>  /**
> + * Match the PCI Driver and Device using the ID Table
> + *
> + * @param pci_drv
> + *	PCI driver from which ID table would be extracted
> + * @param pci_dev
> + *	PCI device to match against the driver
> + * @return
> + *	0 for successful match
> + *	!0 for unsuccessful match
> + */
> +int
> +rte_eal_pci_match(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv,
> +		  struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev);

Yes we definitely need this function.