From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB76139B for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 16:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.201.40.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716393939; cv=none; b=e4bN7CkiBTqp8wCCsaCPuVBzaUhTT4ujgytHeAas1dPwoh++VnW/59p+8wwzqBvS8I1zdxuBFZASwghOtrOnXr7VQIMxJApTRocEEdx5zcxeoWbNj2VZ3dcetOV7MN5xCOlAuHDD/hAJBPnLd/x8D74V6f5EbvhG85kTT8izBRQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716393939; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rc0H+rYBEBGuXMfViZ6Gv+wRn1NStdbwvDtv8EfSxpI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NnkEVDzpgb1OrDsnU25mKmGSrcs1tVaAVTFH6BPbvF8bQwzfZWtnvRLLPwtPMswKiDhYtp3RZprp391SbO28be3CC9o4Ql5bpsKsWQ9LLrujEfcguiHSimgVTRpXJ3hnbLJaMUpccH/9BL3OiwYph12HnzYMHOPsyT4s5Z65kV4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.201.40.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A19606BA2D; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:05:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id HRHn-V7-nUes; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:05:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145FA6195FFF; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:05:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lDaTdi3oANDd; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:05:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2A16195FD0; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:05:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 18:05:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger To: xenomai Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Message-ID: <843802480.134113.1716393932934.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <14c584dd-2847-40c3-a9c8-d38c38dae98a@kernel.org> References: <1716387954-19178-mlmmj-572dc488@lists.linux.dev> <14c584dd-2847-40c3-a9c8-d38c38dae98a@kernel.org> Subject: Fwd: [CPF] Real-time Micro-conference at LPC Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: xenomai@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF97 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: Real-time Micro-conference at LPC Thread-Index: Er3nUa6ANimdxRdBiOkam+PxFm6Bfg== ----- Weitergeleitete Mail ----- > Von: "Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" > The real-time community around Linux has been responsible for > important changes in the kernel over the last few decades. > Preemptive mode, high-resolution timers, threaded IRQs, > sleeping locks, tracing, deadline scheduling and formal > tracing analysis are integral parts of the kernel rooted > in real-time efforts, mainly from the PREEMPT_RT patch set. > The real-time and low-latency properties of Linux has > enabled a series of modern use cases, like low-latency > network communication with NFV and the use of Linux in > safety-critical systems. > > This MC is the space for the community to discuss the advances of > Linux in real-time and low latency features. For example > (but not limited to): > > - Bits left for the PREEMPT_RT merge > - Advances in the fully preemptive mode > - CPU isolation (mainly about how to make it dynamic) > - Tools for PREEMPT_RT and low latency analysis > - Tools for detecting non-optimal usages of the PREEMPT_RT > - Improvement on locks non-protected for priority inversion > - General improvements for locking > - General improvements for scheduling > - Other RT operating systems that run in parallel > with Linux and the integration with Linux (e.g., Xenomai). > - Real-time virtualization > > Examples of topics that the community discussed over the > last years that made progress in the RT MC: > > - timerlat/osnoise tracers and RTLA > - DL server for starvation avoidance > - Proxy execution (still under discussion) > - Tracing improvements - for example, to trace IPIs > > It is important to notice that it is not _only_ about PREEMPT_RT, > but anything related to real-time and low latency. For instance, > CPU isolation, real-time scheduling, timers, other OSs that > run in parallel... and so on. > > Join us to discuss the future of real-time and low-latency Linux. > > This email has a list of people in Bcc, based on a list of > commit authors in sched/locking/power/time. It is far from being > complete. So, please forward this message to the people on > your team working on scheduling-related topics. > > -- Daniel on behalf the organization: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Frederic > Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt, Juri Lelli and myself.