diff for duplicates of <8456682.qhFfChmmK7@diego> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 2e1bf2b..1e596db 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 16:51:39 CET schrieb klaus.goger@theobroma- +Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 16:51:39 CET schrieb klaus.goger at theobroma- systems.com: -> > On 15.12.2017, at 16:33, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: +> > On 15.12.2017, at 16:33, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 13:20:10 CET schrieb Klaus Goger: > >> Make sure the IO domain support is active. This requires to enable @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ systems.com: > At least all currently supported 64bit Rockchip SoCs do have matching VSEL > GRF settings. For me it looked essential enough to enable for all as not > setting the correct I/O voltage will result in no output signal at all. -> But I’m fine with a defconfig change if that’s the way to go. +> But I?m fine with a defconfig change if that?s the way to go. > Should I resend a patch or wait for other opinions? Personally I would go with a defconfig change. I'd really like to keep the diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 349c7fd..a96b22e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,20 +1,15 @@ "ref\020171215122010.34160-1-klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com\0" "ref\02479039.bQBttOkD7L@diego\0" "ref\0DB44D3E4-2CB5-452E-BE79-982225CB9E8F@theobroma-systems.com\0" - "From\0Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] arm64: rockchip: enable Rockchip IO domain support\0" + "From\0heiko@sntech.de (Heiko St\303\274bner)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH] arm64: rockchip: enable Rockchip IO domain support\0" "Date\0Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:55:17 +0100\0" - "To\0klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com\0" - "Cc\0linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" - Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 16:51:39 CET schrieb klaus.goger@theobroma-\n" + "Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 16:51:39 CET schrieb klaus.goger at theobroma-\n" "systems.com:\n" - "> > On 15.12.2017, at 16:33, Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:\n" + "> > On 15.12.2017, at 16:33, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:\n" "> > \n" "> > Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 13:20:10 CET schrieb Klaus Goger:\n" "> >> Make sure the IO domain support is active. This requires to enable\n" @@ -54,7 +49,7 @@ "> At least all currently supported 64bit Rockchip SoCs do have matching VSEL\n" "> GRF settings. For me it looked essential enough to enable for all as not\n" "> setting the correct I/O voltage will result in no output signal at all.\n" - "> But I\342\200\231m fine with a defconfig change if that\342\200\231s the way to go.\n" + "> But I?m fine with a defconfig change if that?s the way to go.\n" "> Should I resend a patch or wait for other opinions?\n" "\n" "Personally I would go with a defconfig change. I'd really like to keep the \n" @@ -64,4 +59,4 @@ "\n" Heiko -e8701974b0654c3f69a1dfefebb15579fc4cebc24dd1a934d41193a4eaccc33b +23e4b2ac3580065998ca17349a760cf95fff854df09caea17a5cfd860eea5037
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.