(Anybody else notice that gmane's archive of xen-devel is
<br>out-of-date? &nbsp;I use digest mode for xen-devel so usually
<br>use gmane for replies... trying nabble instead this time...)
<br>
<br>&gt;There's already a symlink include/asm-xen/asm pointing to the 
<br>&gt;appropriate arch-specific subdir under asm-xen. Or do you mean 
<br>&gt;something else? 
<br>
<br>Hmmm... It seemed like there should be but one didn't appear
<br>when I tried a build (on x86 or ia64). &nbsp;I'll look again.
<br>
<br>&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &lt;asm-xen/asm/synch_bitops.h&gt; 
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt;I can fix this one easily enough. 
<br>
<br>OK, thanks!
<br>
<br>&gt;&gt; - hypervisor.h: about half of this header is 
<br>
<br>&gt;Approximately none of it looks arch-independent. I'd be happy to move 
<br>&gt;the whole lot to asm-xen/asm-i386 and link across to 
<br>&gt;asm-xen/asm-x86_64. Unless you think more than a handful of lines could 
<br>&gt;be kept as arch-independent code? 
<br>
<br>I thought at least the arch-independent function declarations
<br>(which essentially define the API) should stay. &nbsp;I agree this
<br>is probably just a handful of lines.
<br>
<br>thanks,
<br>Dan
<br>
<br><hr align="left" width="30%">
Sent from the <a href="http://www.nabble.com/Fix-blatant-non-archdep%27isms...-need-help-with-build-env-change--t302207.html#a849212">Xen - Dev</a> forum at Nabble.com.