>>   

> wondered about that.  Does that mean you have implementation of this,
>or it it unnecessary on ia64?

I don't think its necessary but I need to define the synch_xxx
functions to xxx.

>> - hypervisor.h: about half of this header is

>There's already arch specific files (for hypercall), I wonder if they
>could be reused?

There probably will be more, though I suppose it would be
possible to put all such arch-dep'isms into a single file.

Dan

--
Sent from the Xen - Dev forum at Nabble.com:
http://www.nabble.com/Fix-blatant-non-archdep%27isms...-need-help-with-build-env-change--t302207.html#a849242